One of my patients tells me about a segment on the CBS Sunday Morning Show about a physician who has the answer to resolving back pain. He has come up with a method of injecting a liquid substance into the intervertebral disc which eventually thickens to plug up any holes or cracks in the disc and allows the disc to maintain its original size. The thought being that a herniated disc is the cause of pain and reversing the herniation will resolve the back pain. He notes that this is such a great idea because it will replace the fusion which has been shown to fail (noted in the segment) in resolving back pain and this process is much cheaper.
I have a simple question for this physician and every other medical practitioner who continues to propagate the notion that a herniated disc is the main cause of back pain, why do roughly 70% of the population have herniated discs and have no back pain? Why do innumerable people with horrific back pain have no herniated discs? The answer is that back pain in the vast majority of cases has nothing to do with the spine.
The American College of Physicians in 2010 recommended that MRIs no longer be used to identify the cause of lower back pain because there is little correlation between positive MRI findings such as herniated discs or stenosis and pain. They determined that in only 3% of patients coming to primary care for back pain their pain could be attributed to a herniated disc and in only 4% the pain could be attributed to stenosis. What percentage of people who have back pain and get an MRI with a positive finding of a herniated disc or stenosis have these findings considered as the diagnosis of their back pain; that would be somewhere around 100%. Understand the chasm between the findings of the medical body responsible for setting policy for physicians and the actual practical application of said physicians. The American College of Physicians actually determined that in 85% of cases lower back pain could not be attributed to a spinal abnormality or disease. I think 85% is bigger than 3%.
Then there is that little percentage of those who have surgery for back pain and the patient ends up with the same if not greater pain. The failure rate for back surgery is somewhere between 50 and 70%. This is not a percentage that should give you great confidence that the structure having surgery performed on it is the one creating the pain being experienced. I have been informed that physicians now tell patients that there is no guarantee that the surgery will change the pain or maybe it will make it better or maybe it will make it worse.
Then there is the theoretical basis for this statement that herniated discs are the primary cause of back. I want any physician who promotes this thought to explain to me how they know that the disc is the tissue emitting the pain signal. The evidence is overwhelming that a positive MRI finding means nothing. So taking away the MRI, I want one clinical indication that the tissue emitting the back pain signal is the intervertebral disc. THERE IS NO CLINICAL INDICATION OF THIS.
What have I proved is the cause of back pain in 90 to 95% of the patients I have treated over 19 years? Most back pain is the result of a muscle weakness or imbalance. The tissue emitting the pain at the back is muscle. It can be proven simply by utilizing palpation. Touch the location where you are having back pain. If the spot you press on increases the level of pain you are experiencing, then the tissue you pressed on is the tissue emitting the pain signal. I can assure you that almost every body who does this will find that they are pressing on a lower back muscle. Even for the rare group that is pressing on the region of the spine, you are most likely pressing on the attachment of the hip flexors to the lumbar spine. Another clinical indicator; look at functional limitations. For a large percentage of my patients, they note that their back pain increases if they sit for a while and then try to stand up. If this is you, then you just confirmed that the cause of your pain is muscular. When you sit, your hip flexors can shorten severely if they are not balanced by the glute (butt) muscles. When you try to stand up, they do not want to lengthen and they pull on the lumbar spine where they attach. This creates pain at this region and also makes it difficult to stand erect again. This has nothing to do with your spine.
I don’t care how many times medical practitioners try to sell people on the idea that the cause of back pain in most cases is the herniated disc. They are trying to follow the premise that if you say a lie enough times it will become the truth. Don’t get caught in this lie. Everyday, I prove to patients that the cause of their back and neck pain is muscle weakness or imbalance and everyday they ask me why nobody else knows this to be the truth. The answer is I was given the gift of logical thought. I never accept anything because it is spoken or written no matter how people profess it. It is either logical or it is crap. My friends, you are looking at a whole lot of crap. Follow logic to resolve your pain, not a cult-like prophesy that has been proven to be false.







